This portion of this web site belongs to our visitors, friends, supporters and to those
who offer reasonable perspectives, even when they are in conflict with OWC's own positions
Wednesday, February 19, 2003
THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA
FEBRUARY 19. From a round-up of my best intell sources, and from my own 15 years of research…the subject is depopulation.
A third of Africa to go under in the first long phase, which is underway now. AIDS and other diseases will be the COVER STORY for the decimation. The real causes will be starvation, contaminated water (which has existed for a long time), toxic vaccines given to people who are already immune-suppressed, wars, and of course, stolen farmland.
Many reports of rural villages disappearing…this will be laid at the doorstep of AIDS. It already is. This is a cover story. This is a lie. HIV, as detailed in my past stories (keyword search my archive), causes nothing. It is basically a dormant retrovirus, like many others of its class. Its "amazingly intricate" activity in the body is a made-up piece of non-science.
The day after my 1988 book, AIDS INC., hit the shelves, a copy was on its way out of California to Moscow in a diplomatic pouch. It was sent by an agent of the USSR who was operating under diplomatic cover here.
This fact was relayed to me by one of my major sources for the book. He said, "Won’t they be surprised when they actually read it."
What he meant was, the Russians at the time were fronting the theory, developed by East German biologist, Jakob Segal, that HIV was a lethal germ engineered in Maryland. A biowar US creation.
My book instead proved that HIV---wherever it came from---was a harmless retrovirus that was being used as a cover story to explain/conceal an emerging depopulation operation in the Third World. HIV was also a cover for other agendas outside the Third World.
As long as AIDS is the target of WHO/UN "humanitarian" efforts, the actual causes---which are easily reversible---of death in Africa, Asia, and Latin America are allowed to remain and fester and expand.
Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, has been a major thorn in the side of the depopulationists. He knows that HIV does not cause human disease. He knows that the front-line drugs for AIDS, especially AZT, attack the bone marrow, where certain cells of the immune system are manufactured. Thus CREATING what is called AIDS through pharmaceutical means. In particular, giving AZT to pregnant mothers is a major goal of the depopulation effort.
Mbeki understands that the causes of death in the Third World I have mentioned above are killing Africa. However, he continues to ask for outside help to alleviate these ravages. There is no chance he will get this help. ZERO.
Mbeki is being contained, to a degree, in his attempts to form a real coalition of leaders all over the African continent. MONEY is the weapon being used against him. Payoffs, "aid" dollars, and so on.
Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier and other retrovirologists were languishing at the end of the 1970s at the National Cancer Institute and the Pasteur Institute, respectively. They had just finished their work on the doomed Viral Cancer Project, which was a failed attempt to show that cancer was caused by one or more viruses---in particular, a newly discovered class of germs called retroviruses. These scientists had cut their teeth on these somewhat exotic but unimportant germs. That was what they knew. They were fishing around for a new disease that could bring them government dollars.
They were SET UP to become the new tigers who would get major research money to explore an emerging phenomenon called AIDS.
HIV was, in their hands, destined to become the COVER STORY for death that actually was occurring for MULTIPLE REASONS.
So Montagnier and Gallo did "discover" HIV and the rest is history---false history.
I apprised the East German biologist Jakob Segal, via mail, that his theory about HIV was way off base. In the sense that it was not causing human disease. If it was indeed a biowar creation, it was a failure.
Either my letter was intercepted, or he ignored it because he had his own agenda. He had answered a previous letter of mine which had asked direct questions about his work---but when I blew the whistle, he fell silent.
Meanwhile, I had interested author and environmentalist Jeremy Rifkin in HIV. For a time---before I discovered the truth---I was exploring the possibility that HIV had been put together from bovine and sheep viruses---and Rifkin was very hot on the bovine factor---because there was a chance that HIV or some bovine germ close to it was in smallpox vaccine. If so, it potentially implicated the vaccine in millions of deaths in the Third World.
But then I dug deeper. I found out that NOTHING strange or exotic needed to be in the vaccine. All by itself it could kill people. Particularly those whose immune systems were suppressed already. And then I examined very closely the medical evidence that had been advanced by Gallo and others to prove that HIV was the cause of what was being called AIDS. I realized, in 1987, that this evidence was non-existent.
I pointed out these two discoveries to Rifkin. He was not pleased. I think he felt a little betrayed, because I had been feeding him much different information before I saw the deeper truth. And Rifkin was basically pointing himself toward a theory that irresponsible medical germ machination itself was implicated in AIDS. He felt that tinkering with germs in labs was where the real action was. I told him the Plot was more insidious than that, and HIV was really a cover story for the depopulation agenda. He soon abandoned his AIDS project.
During this period (1987-88), I met a member of the secret service of one of the African nations "most afflicted with AIDS." This man was basically loyal to his people, and he felt that a gigantic hoax was being perpetrated. At some risk to himself, he spoke to me about various doctors who had come to his family and told them that AIDS research was being done in order to prove that so-called Slim Disease---at that time the African label for AIDS---was the result of HIV. These doctors were amazed that such obviously false research was being accepted. In particular, they cited Lancet, the famous British medical journal, as the publisher of some of this research.
I then did my own examination of a key paper by Serwadda which attempted to establish Slim as a new and emerging phenomenon on the African continent. The paper was so full of unsupported statements, so rife with omissions, that I concluded Slim was basically a diversionary label for: starvation, dirty water, stolen land, and immunosuppressive vaccines.
At bottom, why all this false science? Because someone needed a cover story to conceal a persistent and intentionally unsolved situation in Africa that was causing death according to a plan to depopulate the continent.
A PLAN: DEPOPULATION.
A COVER STORY TO CONCEAL THE PLAN: HIV.
MEDICAL DUPES TO PROVIDE THE COVER STORY: GALLO, MONTAGNIER, SERWADDA, AND OTHERS.
AN INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AGENCY THAT WOULD DO EVERYTHING EXCEPT HELP SOLVE THE REAL AND CONTINUING CAUSES OF DEATH IN AFRICA: THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.
A DIVERSIONARY AND PHONY DEBATE THAT ACTUALLY FORWARDS THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA: WHETHER TO LOWER PRICES ON TOXIC AND DESTRUCTIVE AIDS DRUGS FOR AFRICA.
Remember, Jon is NOT saying that AIDS doesn't kill, he is saying that it is NOT caused by HIV.
Thursday, February 20, 2003
DEPOPULATION AND HIV---PART TWO
FEBRUARY 20. Continuing yesterday’s piece on the big AIDS lie …This is part two,
In 1987, I became re-acquainted with a man who calls himself Ellis Medavoy. He has since retired from his contract work as a propaganda consultant.
Medavoy supplied me with several contact numbers and a small pile of documents. Using these, I convinced myself that he was entirely legitimate. That he in fact was working on AIDS, and in a very curious way.
His job was to influence the press in the direction of completely accepting mainstream research on the subject of HIV. By 1987, this was not what you would call hard work. But he had been at it since 1982---when all sorts of theories about AIDS abounded in the press and in the specialized medical literature.
Medavoy had been retained by "individuals who were part of the Council on Foreign Relations and the British Roundtable but were not acting as official representatives of those groups."
In 1983, a year before HIV (aka HTLV-III) was announced to the world as the official cause of AIDS, Medavoy knew that Robert Gallo would be the messenger for "some kind of retrovirus that would be said to be the driving force behind a global plague."
Medavoy had several tasks before him. The first one was to soften up reporters so they would be receptive to the idea that a virus was the cause of AIDS. Essentially, Medavoy had access to certain key sources that these reporters often used for medical stories.
His job was to convince these sources that "the inside word was" a retrovirus. A retrovirus was causing AIDS. Then these sources would pass that word along to reporters.
Medavoy, of course, already knew these reporters’ "reliable sources." He had been cultivating them for years, in a variety of contexts. They trusted him.
And why not? He seemed to be right on the money time and time again. What he told these sources would happen did happen. And when the sources passed down Medavoy’s advance wisdom to their reporter friends, the reporters were all too happy to get this prized info.
That was how Medavoy worked. He was not alone, of course. There were others like him, and others working on the AIDS issue. Medavoy’s bosses considered AIDS a very big deal. It had to be positioned correctly. It had to be thought of in a certain way, so that it could be used as a smokescreen, a lie, to conceal the depopulation agenda that had been underway for a long time in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.
"When I got this assignment," Medavoy told me, "I knew I was in some very important territory. The world was going to be told a lie, and they were supposed to believe that lie. Civilians, doctors, researchers, politicians---they all had to swallow the propaganda."
And what was the central piece of propaganda?
That HIV was the cause of AIDS.
Medavoy continued, "There were things that the public had to be shielded from, too. Under no circumstances could they get the notion that AIDS was really many different conditions. That was a supreme no-no. The medical journals, as well, had to refrain from picking up that tune. AIDS had to be thought of as ONE disease condition---the destruction of the immune system---which was happening solely because a germ, HIV, was attacking cells of the immune system."
Medavoy understood all of this at least a year before Robert Gallo would tell the world on television that HIV (HTLV-III) was the cause of AIDS.
So Medavoy began to plant the seed.
He began to meet with people (some of them doctors and researchers), and he told them that they could count on the fact that a virus would be found, a virus which was causing AIDS. He told them he had the word from deep inside the major research institutes around the world that were working on the problem. He told them they would be "in no trouble" if they started telling reporters who relied on them that it would be a virus---and a particular kind of virus, a retrovirus.
Medavoy told these people---who were in turn reliable sources for reporters---that Robert Gallo was surely the man who would win the race to find the cause of AIDS. Gallo was the one to keep their eyes on.
Medavoy told me, "Gallo himself was not in on this gigantic hoax. He would steal the germ from Montagnier and call it his own, but that was just theft. Gallo was just a pawn. He was a man who wanted desperately to find a retrovirus as the cause of AIDS, just as he had been a man who desperately wanted to find a retrovirus as the cause of cancer. He had learned this new field of exploration---retroviruses---and it was his only real ticket to fame. He was riding that pony for all it was worth, and the federal money, such as it was in those days, was mainly coming to him and his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute."
Gallo had been selected to be the "HIV messenger" because it was clear he would do whatever it took to finally say, "I found it!" Even if he had not found it. Even if the evidence was missing. (As I’ve written before---and you should keyword-search my archive for many past articles on AIDS and HIV---at the time, in the spring of 1984, when Gallo told the world he had found the cause of AIDS, he had not published a single paper that even purported to seriously prove that HIV was the cause of AIDS.)
Gallo wouldn’t disappoint the planners of this scam. He would deliver the goods. And he did.
And then Medavoy was riding high. All his predictions had come true. What he told these "reliable sources," who in turn passed that information along to reporters, had been exact. AIDS was announced to be a condition caused by a single retrovirus.
Job of lying well done.
Lie accepted.
Universally.
Well, almost.
There were a few disgruntled scientists who fully realized that Gallo had never offered proof that HIV caused AIDS, but they were keeping their mouths shut. They could see the weather shift overnight in the spring of 1984. There was no more federal money for looking into the cause of AIDS, or for confirming or disproving Gallo. It had evaporated in hours. Suddenly, all federal funds were earmarked for discovering HOW HIV caused AIDS, what it actually did inside the body.
I once asked Medavoy, "Did you yourself know what AIDS really was?"
He laughed. "Of course I did. I had to know. I needed that information so I could develop the necessary propaganda to counter it."
"And what was your understanding of what AIDS is?"
"You should know," he said. "You’ve been writing about it."
Here is what he meant, and what I confirmed with him point by point: AIDS is a label given to a whole variety of disease conditions THAT ARE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT THINGS. Not HIV. Not HIV in any way, direct or indirect. What is called AIDS is immune suppression. This immune suppression can result from different causes in different groups and, ultimately, in different individuals. Some of the many causes? Contaminated heroin, medical drugs (such as corticosteroids), starvation, contaminated water supplies, toxic pesticides, intestinal parasites grossly overtreated with massive doses of antibiotics, syphilis, massive drug taking, say, in the form of MDA---combined with months of bathhouse sex with many partners, vaccines given to people whose immune systems are already dangerously compromised. There are other causes.
Medavoy’s propaganda work was aimed, in particular, at masking the continuing causes of death on the African continent---starvation, contaminated water supplies, theft of agricultural lands, and so on. Gradually, these obvious factors would be replaced in the public consciousness with a new buzz-term, HIV. As the real causes of death were allowed to flourish, depopulation would begin to overtake the population growth.
Medavoy worked on the entirely bogus green-monkey theory of AIDS.
"The green monkey," Medavoy told me, "was a myth invented to attribute the origin of HIV to Africa. It was understood that if HIV could be said to have come from Africa, then people would believe the outrageous estimates and projections for future AIDS deaths IN Africa. You know, darkest Africa, where strange and bad things lurk. We played that nonsense like a harp. The green monkey never even carried HIV---of course who cares because HIV causes nothing anyway. But the whole deal about those monkeys was really about lab monkeys in Boston who were found to have a virus ‘similar’ to HIV---and lab contamination was where that ‘similar’ virus actually came from. We knew way ahead of time---as we propounded the early green-monkey story---that it was monkeys in labs we were really talking about. We were talking about stupid and careless research in labs, and we were transferring that whole business into a ridiculous myth about Africa. The story was about as real as the moon being made of cheese."
Tomorrow: Medavoy tries to deal with a scientist who discovered the HIV scam.
JON RAPPOPORT www.stratiawire.com
Dear Friend of Healthful Living International,
Healthful Living International's eNewsletter #29 for February 2003 is
now online
at http://www.healthfullivingintl.org/enewsletter.html.
Enjoy!
Healthfully,
Natalie Tilley
HLI Office Administrator
Subject: Raw World in beautiful Costa
Rica
Dear friend of HLI,
There's
still time to give yourself a most amazing gift for the new year!
HLI's own Doug Graham and
Roz Gruben will be part of the team,
making Raw
World 2003 the BEST raw-food event
ever!
Laurie Masters,
HLI administrator
Presented by
Living Light Culinary Arts
Institute, in association with
The
Institute for Vibrant Living and Healthful Living
International.
Experience Heaven on Earth
February 1-9, 2003
in Montezuma,
Costa Rica
Raw World
International Festival of Raw Food Enthusiasts
Join us for the vacation of a lifetime in beautiful, sunny,
peaceful Costa Rica!
Experience RAW
WORLD where the beautiful sandy
beaches and warm waters of Montezuma, are the backdrop for a unique
opportunity to enjoy gourmet raw vegan cuisine, yoga, dance, play, live
entertainment, internationally renowned health educators and master raw
food chefs.
Discover Costa Rica with
other adventurous raw food enthusiasts as you travel to rain forests,
volcanoes, wildlife parks and hot springs as you have never experienced
them. Delight in watching the monkeys play in the trees and make new human
friends, too!
Play on miles of pristine
white sandy beach with
David Wolfe, Dr. Doug Graham, Cherie Soria, Juliano, Rozalind Gruben,
Caryn Hartglass, Paul Nison, Elaina Love, Matt Samuelson, Victoria
Boutenko, Rodrigo Crespo, Dan Ladermann, Jenny Cornbleet, music maestro
Jas, and other fun-seekers!
NOW is the
time to book your reservations. Airfares to Costa Rica are at an all-time
low. AND, if you mention this bulletin when you register, You will receive
a free hemp tote bag with the RAW WORLD
logo.
Registration is limited, so sign-up today!
Visit our web site at www.RawWorld.org
to register
or phone
800-816-2319 or 707-964-2420 for more
information.
Warning: If you visit the web site and feast on
the beautiful photos of our tropical paradise, you won't be able to resist
the call of RAW WORLD!
Smallpox + 20 Reasons Not To Take The Smallpox Vaccination
Smallpox
by Dr. Vivian Virginia Vetrano
vvvetrano@rionet.cc
A dead disease is being resurrected. Now the media will have something exciting to talk about everyday and to frighten the benighted American public with. For whatever reason, the revivification of smallpox is certainly on the current agenda.
Not too long ago Fox News showed us a picture of a man who was covered with smallpox pustules on his arms, face, legs and abdomen. The pustules were big, black, ugly, scaby and closely compacted. He looked like he was a monster from some other world. It was enough to scare me, were it not for the fact that I know that it was drug treatment that caused that ugly picture and not the disease at all. The cause of those ugly marks was carbolic acid that had been used to kill the supposed germ that caused the eruptive
rash.
Who are the terrorists? The pharmaceutical companies or the Taliban? Because of what the terrorists may or may not do, the pharmaceutical industry (the largest industry in the world), is gearing us up for mandatory vaccinations, especially for certain people in areas that may be targeted by the terrorists. The authorities claim that we will be safe from terrorists attacks using the pox virus because there are adequate stockpiles of cultivated smallpox viruses in Russia and in the USA to make most all the vaccines "needed."
It is claimed by medical historians that the vaccination process wiped out smallpox throughout the world. However, the truth is that compulsory vaccination was abandoned because more deaths were caused by the vaccinations than there were cases of smallpox. A slight of the hand trick was used to foster the claim that smallpox was eradicated by the vaccination practice. Everyone who had been vaccinated and who developed smallpox was diagnosed as having chicken pox!
The doctors who were interviewed on recent television shows admit that the vaccine may cause many serious side-effects and that a certain number of persons will develop painful and sometimes lethal sequelae. Yet, they advise that it is better to take the chance and be vaccinated in spite of these dangers.
Edward Jenner, a notorious fake and quack, is credited with having "discovered" vaccination. However, it was a practice of many ancient peoples long before his time. Savage and barbaric tribes in various parts of the world practiced inoculation even before Jenner’s time. It is conjectured to have begun in India and then spread to Africa and Europe. Lady Mary Wortley Montague, wife of the British Ambassador to the Ottoman Court in l7l7 introduced the practice to Europe. But, due to its proven evils, one of which was an increase in smallpox in England, the practice was abolished in l840.
It is pertinent that James Phipps, the eight year old boy vaccinated by Jenner in l896, died at the age of 20. He had been re-vaccinated twenty times. Jenner’s own son who had also been vaccinated more than once died at the young age of twenty-one. Both succumbed to tuberculosis, a condition that some researchers have linked to the smallpox vaccine. (Eleanor Mc Bean, The Poisoned Needle, 28,29,66 ).
According to the medical profession, smallpox or variola is an acute highly infectious and contagious disease characterized by a specific rash. According to past and present Natural Hygienic practitioners smallpox is primarily a disease brought about by gastrointestinal putrescence. Fermenting and rotting food in the intestinal tract enervates, and causes increased digestive impairment accompanied by increased systemic toxemia. The toxins are from the absorption of the fermentation products formed in the intestinal tract. Since those who overeat, especially on animal products, are enervated, meaning they lack normal nerve function, all the organs of elimination are functioning on a lower physiological level and greater toxicity ensues. Toxins from decomposing animal foods are highly irritating, so the body has to get rid of them quickly and must use extraordinary means since the organs of elimination are not functioning well. Therefore, the poisons are carried by the blood to the skin and the body eliminates them in various forms of skin eruptions.
Smallpox is about as contagious as stumbling over a rock. Dr. Herbert M. Shelton slept in the same bed with his brother while the latter was in the so-called infectious stage with vesicles all over. Yet Dr. Shelton did not develop smallpox.
Smallpox begins with the same symptoms that many acute diseases do; such as chills, fever, backache, and vomiting. This is indicative of a common cause and a common way to deal with the cause. The body is a magnificent ecosystem and when it finds abnormal and extraneous substances anywhere within its domain, it creates a higher temperature, purposely, to overcome the foreign proteins, toxic substances, viruses, bacteria or other microorganisms. Whatever is upsetting the ecosystem must be corrected by the organism itself. It needs no alien "cures." The symptoms should not be "cured." To suppress these symptoms assures that some other worse problem will develop.
Some substances, such as an excess of protein putrefactive products, are so toxic that it is urgent to eliminate them immediately. The papular eruption of smallpox is purposely created and chosen as the correct channel at the time for the elimination of these types of noxious substances. Furthermore, the body may not have the specific enzymes to biodegrade whatever it is. Instead of being taken care of by the liver or the kidneys the body chooses to eject them through the skin. Vicarious eliminations such as this are often natural emergency measures.
Smallpox begins with chills, fever, backache, headache and vomiting. A fever of l03 to l04 degrees F is customary. The high fever increases the healing activities of the cells, and it is a most efficient way to accomplish the needed detoxification. This means that the toxins are now out of the functioning cells and in the blood near the skin. The body no longer needs to speed up cellular metabolism in order to cast out the extraneous substances and the fever subsides. In about two days the fever, and other symptoms subside. This is when the inflammatory rash appears. It turns into an elevation of the skin called a papule. The blister becomes dimpled or umbilicated. The rash and the development of the papules indicate that the irritants or toxic substances have been removed by the hyperactive, feverish cells and carried to the skin to be cast out.
Next the little papules become vesicles, like a blister, except that each papule has a little dimple in it. This is the so-called stage that is supposed to be infective or contagious, should anyone touch the person having smallpox. After the vesicles are formed, they may become pustules filled with white blood cells if the individual is extra toxic. The white blood cells are there to destroy the toxins in the vesicles. But, this stage would never be reached if cared for Hygienically. The papules dry up and form scabs that eventually fall off. When treated improperly they will leave a scar.
It is pertinent to recognize that when the eruption begins, the fever subsides. The patient would normally be on the road to recovery were it not for the medications given by the doctor. Medical treatment however, consists in using something that kills the microbes which they assume cause the rash, so it has to be something such as a disinfectant that destroys cell life. This is consistent with their medical dogma. Therefore, in the past, the profession applied gauze that had been soaked in antiseptic solutions such as phenol (carbolic acid) or bichloride of mercury ( aka mercuric chloride and corrosive sublimate). Both these agents, carbolic acid and mercuric chloride are corrosive.
After applying the gauze, soaked in either carbolic acid or mercuric chloride, to the lesions, they were covered with more gauze. Being tightly wrapped with gauze, the exudate from the vesicle or papule was retained in the lesion and not allowed to drain away when it ruptured. Naturally, bacteria are going to invade this lesion to clean up the excreted matter. This corrosive treatment also destroyed living tissues including the protective phagocytic white blood cells and the surrounding skin and subcutaneous tissues. A high second fever was urgently needed to once again begin warfare on the extraneous poisons and the invading bacteria.
Either of the two corrosive drugs used can now ooze its way into the vital domain and impede normal function of all the cells in the body; while completely annihilating many. Ugly black confluent pustules mar the skin. The rash gets worse. Vesicles turn into pustules. The pustules become swollen and more inflamed. The inflammation around them spreads and the lesions fuse together. These pathological effects were caused by the drugs.
It is clear that the condition worsens because of the treatment. The primary symptoms, i.e. the fever, chills, headache, and backache were suppressed by pharmaceuticals. The stifling of symptoms with medication prevented the body from completing its job of cleansing, and increased the internal toxemia. As a result, the umbilicated blisters with clear fluid in them became pustules filled with dead and dying tissues and white blood cells. The change to a pustule is the direct result of the damaging effects of medications whether taken internally or applied to the skin. It is incredible that the physicians did not recognize the lethality of their practice. But, then, they do not recognize it today either. They are blinded by bygone theories.
These substances may have killed microorganisms but they also killed human tissues and in reality caused the pustules and all the terrible complications and symptoms thought to be caused by the germ. Let me emphasize, the symptoms thought to be smallpox are symptoms caused by the treatment. They were so yesterday just as they are today and always will be in the future as long as we insist on clinging to the idea that disease is something "caught" and that symptoms must be gotten rid of by unnatural means. As long as we try to eradicate disease with anything, and especially man-made chemicals, we will suffer more than if we merely put up with the symptoms.
All the various treatments to kill microbes which are "causing" the disease, are killing the patient. They are not permitting the body to eliminate toxins or restore the blood and tissues to their normal healthy condition. All treatments, no matter how benign they are claimed to be, impede the recovery process itself. By using treatments of any kind and getting rid of a rash by rash means, or to doctor it in any way, is the disastrous blunder that causes horrible side-effects, more disease and even death.
Hemorrhagic or what is known as "black smallpox" is an even more serious type of smallpox and the patient often died. Again, this serious type of smallpox was directly caused by the cell-killing drugs. Pustules often developed in the throat and mouth. When an acidic drug is placed on living tissues, it kills them. The skin and mucous membranes are already inflamed and are less protective than normal skin. Therefore, the destructive acids can be absorbed and cause greater internal toxemia. Carbolic acid or mercuric chloride caused the hemorrhaging of the skin and also hemorrhaging into the pustule. Either of the corrosive drugs also destroyed the kidney cells and caused bloody urine noted in many hapless smallpox patients.
There were also many serious complications of this type of treatment in addition to the common ordinary ones that were erroneously thought to be symptoms of smallpox, but we won’t go into them now.
From time immemorial people have been frightened of disease. It was a curse, an evil spirit, or evil demon that caused the problem. Also from time immemorial people have thought it necessary to exorcize the disease, to placate and appease the evil spirit or demon, to give sacrifices to some god in order to get the demon or evil spirit out of them. In modern times we do the same. We have not grown in knowledge. We just put the evil spirits in the magician’s top hat and pulled out the evil germs and evil viruses. We still exorcize, placate, appease, and eradicate the evil microbe or evil virus. Whatever symptoms we have, they are felt to be extraneous, foreign and not from us, so they must be eradicated or extirpated. We still fear death from the simplest of diseases. Whatever it is, it must be extirpated or eradicated. We do it not with incantations but with substances much more evil than anything used in the past.
Hygienic Care
If Hygienic care had been resorted to in the beginning of smallpox no complications would have occurred and there would rarely be a genuine pustule. With Hygienic management the disease would not have to progress to the second stage with pustules or a second fever. It would only become pustular if the individual prevented drainage of the vesicle and continued eating a heavy diet. The vesicles containing the unwanted debris that was in the organs and tissues would burst. The clear fluid containing the toxic substances would flow out onto the skin. Frequent warm sponge baths would wash away all the poisonous debris. The inflammation of the skin would heal and that would be the end of the disease. There would be no horrendous pustules, or other complications brought about by the medications. If individuals kept themselves clean, but did not take off the scabs until they fell off naturally, there would be no unsightly pock-marks. People are always too anxious to pull scabs away. To do so is to expose the lesion to the atmosphere before the skin has completely healed below it. The skin then has to quickly heal over before it has completed restoring the underlying tissues. This, naturally leaves a pit or scar. The extensive boils and gangrene that regularly occurred would not have taken place had no corrosive drugs been used.
If you think those symptoms are bad, and that we do not use any medicine so lethal as corrosive sublimate and carbolic acid today, you’d better rethink the problem. Today’s drugs are even more lethal because they are designed to be easily absorbed, and to spread to every tissue and cell in the body and kill cells all over the body. Do not put your hope in medical "care". The only care you need is a healthy body and to let it do its thing.
You do not have to fear smallpox, even if you should develop it, as long as you immediately quit eating and go to bed and rest, drinking pure water only when thirsty. Smallpox is a disease of the bon-vivant, epicurean, who overeats on a daily basis, especially on animal foods. The condition of enervation is built by anyone who does not secure sufficient rest and sleep to permit the elimination of endogenic and exogenic toxins, and for the restoration of the nervous system. Once the stage of enervation is established digestion is further impaired and the body is flooded with fermentation and decomposition products from the intestines. This is what is called Toxemia, and Toxicosis. Toxicosis makes it exigent and imperative that these toxins be eliminated immediately by extraordinary means, such as through the skin.
Every single cell in your body is capable of eliminating and destroying various microorganisms and their waste products, as well as man-made organic products, but most man-made products are more toxic than those made by bacteria and they cause more damage than bacterial waste products. It can be disastrous when the body is overwhelmed by substances that do not belong inside it, and which the body cannot use under any circumstance of life. And this is what happens when diseases are "treated." Your body is inundated with toxic substances and it may drown.
**
Dr. Vivian Virginia Vetrano graduated in l965 from the Texas Chiropractic College, summa cum laude. After working at Dr. Shelton's Health School for several years she went on to study Naturopathy, Homeopathy, and Medicine. In addtion to her Chiropractic degree she holds degrees in Homeopathy and Medicine. When she was an undergraduate she studied Radiation Biology at Trinity University, San Antonio and was the first person to make the public aware of the dangers of ionizing radiation through the many articles she authored on this subject. Dr. Vetrano gives personal consultations by telephone. For information you may write Dr. Vetrano at P.O. Box l90, Barksdale, Texas 78828; or call 830-234-3499; or fax 830-234-3599.
20 Reasons Not To Take The Smallpox Vaccination
By Amy Worthington
1. George W. Bush has said of smallpox vaccination: "One of my concerns if we were to have universal vaccination, some might lose their life." ~The Times (in London), November 09, 2001.
2. For each million people vaccinated with the smallpox vaccine, as many as 250 could die, according to the American Medical Association. Multiply 250 times 285 (millions of Americans) and the possible deaths from universal smallpox vaccination could equal 71,250. ~ Journal of the American Medical Association, June 9, 1999, Vol. 281, No. 22, p. 2132.
3. "The American Medical Association said on Tuesday it was not in favor of an immediate mass U.S.smallpox vaccination program, saying the potential threat of a bioterror attack did not warrant inoculating every American against the disease." ~Reuters, December 12, 2001.
4. "Right now the risk of getting the vaccine is higher than the benefit. You could get a secondary infection, a full-blown systemic infection." ~Marie Rau, Panhandle Health District nurse, quoted by The Spokesman-Review, November 20, 2001.
5. CDC director Jeffrey Koplan has admitted that universal smallpox vaccination could unleash a significant number of side-effects. He said that because many parts of ourpopulation do not have a "robust immune system," a fair number of people could have serious reactions. ~Koplan speaking on the PBS special "Bioterror Propaganda" aired by WETA, November 14, 2001.
6. If the entire nation were to receive a smallpox vaccine, several thousand people would likely develop encephalitis, an inflammation of the brain. ~Washington Post, Dec. 26, 2001.
7. Roger J. Pomerantz, chief of the infectious disease department at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, said that doctors have no idea what the smallpox vaccine might do to people at the extremes of life--less than 2 and older than 65. He said that an even greater concern would be its effect on people with weakened immune systems from HIV infection, chemotherapy or transplants. ~Washington Post, Dec. 26, 2001.
8. "Researchers have been reluctant to recommend a new vaccination program which would use the smallpox vaccine for the local population because the vaccine can cause disease and death in persons with inadequate immune systems." ~Science, Vol. 277, July 18, 1997, pp. 312-13.
9. Routine smallpox vaccination in the United States ended in 1972. Officials are hesitant to resume the immunizations because the vaccine is the most reactive of all and has been linked to serious side effects, including death. ~ Reuters, November 29, 2001.
10. Eight printed pages of medical studies documenting the many serious side effects of smallpox vaccination can be obtained at www.whale.to/vaccines/smallpox.html. See "smallpox vaccine adverse reactions 66-76." [Note: go to the home page above and put "smallpox vaccine adverse reaction" in the search engine.] Repercussions include serious brain and heart diseases, autism, abnormal chromosomal changes, diabetes, various cancers and leukemias, plus demyelination of nerve tissue years after vaccination.
11. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that vaccination must not be forced on persons whose physical condition would make such vaccination "cruel and inhuman." In other words, the state has no right to command that an individual sacrifice his life in the name of public health. ~Jacobsen V. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
12. By the 1920s, several British medical researchers documented that smallpox was not only more common among the VACCINATED, but that the DEATH RATE from smallpox was actually higher among those who had been vaccinated. This indicates that the vaccine was ineffective and predisposed vaccinated persons to more lethal disease. ~Vaccination, Dr. Viera Scheibner, Australia, 1993, pp. 205-220. 13. Getting a vaccination does not guarantee immunity. ~CDC, January 28, 1994.
14. By 1987, scientific evidence indicated that the World Health Organization's 13-year global smallpox vaccination campaign may have awakened dormant HIV infection in many vaccinees. ~Times (in London) May 11, 1987.
15. Vaccines made from animal substrate contain animal viruses that are impossible to filter out. By 1961, scientists discovered that animal viruses in vaccines, including smallpox, could act as a carcinogen when given to mice in combination with cancer-causing chemicals, even in amounts too small to induce tumors alone. They concluded that vaccine viruses function as a catalyst for tumor production. ~Science, December 15, 1961.
16. Some of the new smallpox vaccine doses will be created with animal substrate. Because the vaccine will incorporate vaccinia, the cowpox virus, many wonder about possible mad-cow contamination. Fifty-five million doses of the new vaccine will be created using a cell line dating back to 1966 and cultured from the lung tissues of an aborted human fetus. ~World Net Daily, December 4, 2001.
17. The new smallpox vaccine will be genetically engineered. Many scientists believe that genetically engineered vaccines may be responsible for the global epidemic of auto-immune disease and neurological dysfunction. ~American College of Rheumatology, annual meeting, Nov. 8-12, 1998. Merck's genetically engineered hepatitis B vaccine, Recombivax HB, is a classic example. According to Dr. Bonnie Dunbar of Baylor College of Medicine, many thousands of reported adverse reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine include: chronic fatigue, neurological disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and MS-like disease. ~Testimony of Dr. Dunbar to Texas Dept. of Health, March 12, 1999. Over 15,000 French citizens sued the French government to stop mandatory hepatitis B injections for school children because of resulting auto-immune diseases. ~Science, July 31, 1998. Dr. John Classen has published voluminous data showing that the hepatitis B and other vaccines are closely linked to the development of insulin dependent diabetes. ~Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, October 22, 1997.
18. The British vaccine manufacturer Medeva has a horrendous record of contamination and blunders. In 2000, the FDA found that Medeva was making vaccines in conditions of filth, resulting in contaminated products. Medeva had been illegally using bovine medium to culture its polio vaccines, then lied about it. Medeva also used the blood of a Creutzfeldt-Jakob victim (mad cow) to manufacture 83,000 doses of polio vaccine used for (against?) Irish children. Nevertheless, the FDA allowed the USA to accept Medeva's flu vaccine Fluvirin for the year 2000. ~London Observer series: October 20-26, 2000.
19. In 2001, the British socialized health care system was reported to be in a state of collapse, with many hospitals and labs operating in abysmal filth. Five thousand people die each year from infections contracted in British hospitals; 10,000 become deathly ill from such infections. Sterilization procedures are barely adequate and said to be risking the spread of mad cow disease. Government ministers are reportedly trying to hush up the scandal. ~www.itn.co.uk/ Jan 06, 2001; The Sunday Times of London, November 12, 2001.
20. The U.S. government apparently intends to conduct NO double blind studies on the safety and efficacy of the new smallpox vaccine. It has ordered 286 million doses, one for every man, woman and child in America at a cost of $428 million. At least half of this vaccine will be delivered by Acambis PLC of great Britain.
Tip of the Week: Keep all vaccine needles away from your body! ___
Vaccination Liberation - Idaho Chapter Ingri Cassel, President
P.O. Box 1444
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83816
208) 255-2307 / 765-8421
www.vaclib.org
"The Right to Know, The Freedom to Abstain"
Comment From kh6 1-9-2
I wouldn't take the vaccine either but consider this: Point #2 extrapolates the number of deaths following vaccination at 71,250. For perspective, this number is less than the number of deaths in 1996 from heart disease (733,361), cancer (539,533) and stroke (159,942). The number of deaths from smallpox vaccination would be less than the number of deaths from chronic respiratory diseases (106,027) and accidents (94,948), but more than the number of deaths from diabetes mellitus (61,767) and HIV (31,130) (CDC, for the year 1996).
Date: 03/28/01 09:52:39 PM
Name: Henry LN (Andy) Anderson
Email: truth@organicwellness.com
Subject: National Health Association
Website: http://www.organicwellness.com
January 10, 2001
Mr. Mark Alan Epstein, President
Board of Directors
NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION
P. O. Box 30630
Tampa, Florida 33630
Subject: “National Health Association”
Dear Mark:
I was a member of the American Natural Hygiene Society for ten years; I am acquainted with members of your family and its support of the organization. About ten years ago, I interviewed your sister and you for my award-winning cable television show, “Organic Wellness Crusade.” I’ve watched you ‘grow up’ within the Society; now the Society is no more! What a tragic blunder!
Recently, I wrote to Dr. Timothy J. Duszynski, the new Executive Director of National Health Association, expressing my dismay at what I see happening. I referred him to a letter from my organization (OWC) on this issue to James Michael Lennon in late November 1999. (See http://www.organicwellness.com/Letters from OWC). There was no reply to that letter; and, I did not contact Jim further about a specific response.
I just finished reading Health Science magazine (Winter, 2001) and I am appalled! Things I have overlooked for years (when the organization was American Natural Hygiene Society) should raise the concern of Natural Hygienists everywhere, and of those now embracing the “National Health Association” (a name, by the way, that is indistinguishable from “the other guys!”).
First, in the background “Interview with New NHA Executive Director Timothy J. Duszynski, Ph.D.,” there is no indication that Dr. Duszynski has any knowledge of, or respect for Dr. Herbert M. Shelton or of his life-long research. There is no indication of any commitment to Dr. Shelton’s legacy. Duszynski is presented simply as one who subscribes to some “possibly sound and sane ideas,” with clear (though implicit) notions that he knows and can communicate “the language of fund raising.”
Such impressions shame and insult that body of tested and proven information that Dr. Herbert M. Shelton and his contemporaries saw fit to refer to as a science, the science of Natural Hygiene. Recent “discrediting efforts” are treasonous.
Dr. Shelton’s book titles are absent from the magazine; tapes and publications are all by persons who have benefited from Dr. Shelton’s timeless research; yet, of Dr. Herbert M. Shelton, this is what the entire Winter 2001 edition of Health Science magazine included about our benefactor:
“Recent Memorial Gifts and Bequests help the NHA: We wish to thank Mr. and Mrs. Louis M. Rossner of San Antonio, Texas for their gift in honor of Mrs. Rossner’s (Willowdeen) father, Herbert M. Shelton, in commemoration of the l05th anniversary of his birth. Herbert Shelton was one of the co-founders of the American Natural Hygiene Society (page 21).”
It almost appears there is a deliberate move to disassociate the name and credit for research from Dr. Herbert M. Shelton. But why? In the political arena, this “name-change, forget Shelton” strategy would be labeled a coup d’etat. That is exactly what has been pulled on unsuspecting dues paying members of the (former) American Natural Hygiene Society!
The battle may have been won, but not the war. Those behind this indecent and shortsighted development might have employed a democratic approach. Well meaning or not, there are too many things wrong about this “new” focus. There are too many unanswered questions.
Would Dr. Shelton embrace “blood-letting” as a sound hygienic approach? Would Dr. Shelton ‘discourage’ fasting, except as supervised by “hired hands?” T. C. Fry, author of The Great AIDS Hoax, was a loyal disciple of Dr. Herbert M. Shelton; he was “neutralized” in the Dominican Republic in 1996. Harvey and Marilyn Diamond, authors of Fit for Life, were loyal disciples of T. C. Fry. They made a lot of money from their #1 Best Seller; but, they lost each other. In the process Directors of ANHS-and the Executive Director-saw an opportunity to increase memberships; so, the Diamonds were “pimped,” as I once heard it put.
But, something more subtle was also happening, something hidden from the view of the masses (and from sight of those self-righteous “professionals” who fancy that their information and avocations are more reliable than were Dr. Shelton’s research and writings!
During the 15-year period since the publication of Fit for Life, thousands of new members found their way into the American Natural Hygiene Society (yet, neither Marilyn nor Harvey Diamond ever “qualified” to membership in the exclusive, “not-recommended-by-the-Association” International Association of Hygienic Physicians!). Two other curious things happened: First, the practice of food combining became a standard practice for many health-conscious individuals and was credited with reducing or fully eliminating a host of health complaints. Second, if the ‘bottom line’ of the ant-acid industry (Tagamen!) were $13, 000,000,000.00 and dropped some five-percent, in real dollars that would represent a loss of some $750,000,000.00 in annual sales!
So, why has the name of the American Natural Hygiene Society been changed to “National Health Association?” Why has there been a concentrated effort to de-emphasize and discredit food combining? Would you believe it’s about money? “Change your name and back off food combining, and you’ll never again have to be concerned about funding?” Is this how it went down? Is this why James Michael Lennon and Susan Taylor packed it in? Or, is there more to it?
How does the “National Health Association” justify accepting (taking money) from either members or others, with nothing more than an “it sounds good to us” program? The Association states no foundation (Dr. Herbert M. Shelton) or other research or scientific orientation for its advocacy. It offers member no specific suggestions; there are no trained and reliable “professionals” whom the Association either certifies, qualifies or recommends based on its own fundamental philosophy and beliefs (despite passing on an opportunity to “write the curriculum” for a graduate program in Natural Hygiene through City University Los Angeles as far back as 1990!).
In fact, the National Health Association publishes its disclaimer on page 17, Winter 2001 edition of Health Science: “NHA (National Health Association) does not diagnose, prescribe, or recommend any particular treatment or approach (emphasis, mine) to any specific condition, but simply makes available the names and addresses of IAHP (International Association of Hygienic Physicians) members as a public service. In providing this information, NHA assumes no responsibilities for fees charged, health care rendered, or guidance provided. NHA is a nonprofit, education organization dedicated to educating the public in the principles of ‘Health Through Healthful Living.’”
The “disclaimer” is faulty because the Association ‘admits’ that it is aware persons will be charged fees, administered health care services, and provided professional guidance-although not recommended-the implication is that all the above are recommended by the Association (as opposed to other available options). Are unsuspecting members being led to “not recommended” ‘slaughter houses?’ Or, is there some commitment to these facilities and these practitioners? One would hope so!
What are these principles of “Health Through Healthful Living?” Is one of them not fasting when the organism is out of balance? Certainly, Dr. Shelton advocated fasting. Is one of them not “to do no harm” to the organism? Certainly, Dr. Shelton advocated doing no harm (as T. C. Fry put it, not attempting to remedy imbalance by submitting to “poisons euphemistically called ‘medicines!’”).
An even larger question comes before us. If the NHA has no program; stands on no foundation; takes no position as to options for reversing ill-health conditions; pre-qualifies no practitioners as advocates of a proven way of living better; recommends no professional ‘hygienic healers’ or “health care” providers; and is only an ‘observer,’ what does membership in NHA imply? Are members getting what they signed on for?
If “the National Health Association (NHA) has no direct or indirect financial interest in the IAHP Physicians List,” why is there no charge for this advertisement? Why does NHA-for years on end-provide this “free advertisement” for profit-making enterprises, to the exclusion of all other similar organizations, or lists of service providers? Does NHA violate its non-profit charter by this favoritism? These are some of the questions raised by the recent “coup.”
As Rod Serling used to say on his popular television show, Twilight Zone, “There are many stories in the Twilight Zone; these are but a few of them!”
Finally, in my recent letter to Dr. Timothy J. Duszynski (who, no doubt is a dedicated man!), I requested a full refund of my Life Membership dues, because I joined and wanted to be a part of the American Natural Hygiene Society. I objected to and attempted to challenge any underhanded move to change the organization’s name. My efforts were unsuccessful. I want no part of the National Health Association. That name sounds like the allopathic establishment. I might have entertained “International Health Association,” but was never given that or any other option. Besides, I have take real issue with what appears to be a trend “away from Sheltonian structures.” I take exception to that general strategy; and I suspect a ‘take over’ of the Association by “establishment money” in the foreseeable future.
My next course of action will depend, in large measure, to the responses I get from the Executive Director and from you as President of the Board of Directors (of NHA).
Written with a great deal of concern, I am
Faithfully yours,
Henry L. N. "“Andy"”Anderson, Ed.D.,
Fruitarian and Life Member, ANHS
Founder, http://www.organicwellness.com
Chancellor, City University Los Angeles
Cc: Members of the Board of Directors, NHA
Dr. Joyce Willoughby
Dr. Howard Lyman
Dr. Harvey Diamond
Dr. Kelli Greene
Dr. Kenneth Desrosiers
Dr. Paul Goss
IAHP Members
Mr. Tarik Ricard
Mr. Don Weaver
Dr. Timothy J. Dusznyski, Exe. Dir. (NHA)
Dr. Margie N. Johnson
Date: 03/13/01 12:39:18 AM
Name: T. Colin Campbell
Email: tcc1@cornell.edu
Subject: Stop the foot and mouth lies NOW
Dear Organic (really?):
We need not worry too much whether or not foot and mouth disease is exaggerated, whether or not Mad Cow Disease is real, whether or not milk is contaminated with hormones and all manner of antibiotics, and whether or not 95% of our dioxin exposure comes from animal based foods (including cow milk products, of course)--although each of these problems are known to exist. This is because scientific research has now shown quite conclusively--in my view--that even the most pristine livestock food products, with or without contamination, still are a health hazard when we consume them as we do.
I say this because of my having come from the farm milking cows, having done my doctoral work in animal nutrition at Cornell University to see how we might grow ruminants more efficiently so we could eat more of them and drink more of their milk, and having spent the equivalent of 74 grant-years of YOUR well earned public money to study with my many students and other researchers why animal based foods were so healthy--or so I thought.
Very simply, they are not! And the empirical evidence on this point, if interpreted properly, is far more than simply impressive. It is VERY impressive.
I also loved the farm, sometimes wishing that I had never left, and my heart is still with the farming community. But, now that I have seen--from so many perspectives, the health ills inflicted by animal based foods, I must speak my conscience, regardless whether I wanted to see these results or not. I also know that farmers would do better--economically I might add, if they chose to get into the fruit and vegetable business. Here, in upstate New York, I know of large farm families who have done just this and they end up with private planes to fly to Florida for the winter!
I do not know the details of the foot and mouth disease to speak intelligently about whether or not there is an epidemic or whether one is impending. But I really don't much care because these foods, with or without infection and contamination, simply do not mean health. It is time that we begin to think about the physiological and mental health of ALL OUR FELLOW CITIZENS, not just the economic health of a few. I have found it personally wrenching to tell my message to my friends from the farm, but I find consolation in the fact that these friends are not now what they once were. Some estimates now suggest that 90+% of the farm produce is NOT PRODUCED by family farmers, as I knew them; these foods are produced, the market is controlled, and much of the information is promoted by big commercial interests who don't really give a damn either about public health or about the family farm, for that matter.
I do understand your plight and I suspect that you really do believe that there is a myth about foot and mouth disease. But, there is another view, one that is even more serious and one that I would hope that you might find worthy of consideration.
Sincerely,
T. Colin Campbell
Date: 03/13/01 12:35:18 AM
Name: Organic Wellness Crusade
Email: truth@organicwellness.com
Subject: Hoof and Mouth Epidemic - Is it Real??
Website: http://www.organicwellness.com
Dear reader, as you may well be aware, newspapers and televisions
across the world are telling us of a crisis in our
countryside...the foot and mouth epidemic - striking livestock
everywhere.
These stories are a gross distortion. There is no epidemic. This
belief is based on twisted and unproven science.
And the resultant slaughter is based entirely on errant 19th
century agricultural policy.
The reason why our governments are not stopping this needless cull
is because of entrenched protectionism
and entrenched scientific error, their pride in that they cannot
admit that they are wrong, and of course.....vested interests.
As a result of the current slaughter policy, the livelihoods of
thousands and thousands of farmers and agricultural land workers
across Europe and soon the US are in jeopardy.
If left unchecked, this errant policy will not just affect
thousand...it will affect millions of people.
Go now to
www.whatareweswallowing.freeserve.co.uk/footandmouth
and read the truth behind the lies.
We can put a stop to this.
Did you know that we are only six handshakes away from a king?
Pass on the above url to just six people, and we can help put a
stop to this senseless slaughter.
|
Please enter comments on the above or other items here:
| |
|
|
© December, 2000 by Henry L. N. Anderson
|
